I don’t know which ranked playlist you are playing, or what rank you are but generally in the higher ranks, platinum5-diamond3, there is always the “carry vs carry” style. If you legit are in ranked matches with people not getting kills at all, then either you need to start helping your teammates more (which is 99% of the time the case), or something else is going on like a rank skew, smurf, or they are boosted. Social you'll see more of the "carry vs carry" style matches but that's mainly due to more lax sbmm that's just trying to find fast matches. Originally posted by Hawkner:One thing to consider is with ranked the brackets should be generally tighter. I never got a chance to play Bungie-Era ranked, but the multiplayer experiences were amazingly balanced, from the weapon sandbox to the player matchmaking It’s really quite obvious as Halo 4&5’s campaign were either lacklustre or downright terrible, while the multiplayer was being used to attract newer audiences from other games- effectively f*cking up the old player-base who enjoyed the Bungie era of games. Yeah, 343 for the past few years has been solely serving the “competitive audience,” by that meaning taking advice purely from Esport Halo Players or similar. You can find more information on it and similar systems via the Twitter account of Joshua Menke who partially worked on the matchmaking systems that Halo 3 and Halo 5 used (alongside StarCraft, notably). Originally posted by 『Titan』:Halo Infinite matchmaking is designed to give you a 50% or so chance to win a particular match, by matching you both with and against similarly skilled players. It would have been so easy to just let players earned ranks power check each other, and not build systems to constantly force people into "50% challenge matches" for literally every match they will ever play. Honestly I don't know why 343 make this ranking system so pointlessly convoluted. You'd quickly climb past people who were not as good as you, and eventually hover around your skill rank when you start actually playing against people who are a challenge.Īnd ultimately you knew that all the other players around were we're around your skill level, and not just arbitrarily pulled from the void to balance out your "team skill level". You climbed ranks based purely on your individual win/loss ratio.Īnd you could not skip the ranked climb and be placed in a generic "bracket". The old Halo ranked systems atleast felt fair, The game ACTIVELY punishes you for being good at it. If you're an exceptionally good player, it feels like you're being dragged down by 50% of your team constantly. Which, you might say this isn't how the system works Honestly if feels more like its adding the sum total skill of your team vs the sum total skill of the enemy team.ġ Great player, 1 Generally Good player, 2 bad playersĪnd unless you're playing slayer, 1 person doesn't really carry a team. I don't know if the systems metrics for "similarly skilled" players is ever, if at all accurate. Halo Infinite matchmaking is designed to give you a 50% or so chance to win a particular match, by matching you both with and against similarly skilled players. Originally posted by Bullz:the ping stuff is just you but the game does try to force a 50% winrate so it does happen where the game somtimes puts you on a team where you have a 40% chance of winning.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |